CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)
CT+ ContrastAbdomen & Pelvis
Indications
- Colorectal cancer screening (average risk)
- Incomplete optical colonoscopy or patients unable/unwilling to undergo it
- Evaluation of obstructing colonic lesion (proximal colon mapping)
Patient prep
- Cathartic bowel prep (PEG or sodium phosphate-based) the day before
- Fecal/fluid tagging: oral barium and/or iodinated oral contrast (e.g., diatrizoate/Gastrografin) with meals the day before to tag residual stool/fluid
- Low-residue diet day prior; NPO morning of exam
- Colonic insufflation with CO2 (preferred, automated) or room air at time of exam via thin rectal catheter
Contrast
AgentOral tagging agent (barium +/- iodinated); IV iodinated optional
Routeoral (tagging), rectal (CO2 insufflation - gas not iodine), IV optional
DoseTagging per regimen; IV contrast (100-125 mL) only if combined diagnostic/staging indication
TimingScreening CTC is typically non-IV-contrast; IV contrast added for symptomatic/known cancer staging
Technique
- Insufflate colon with CO2 to adequate distention; verify on scout
- Scan supine AND prone (or decubitus) to redistribute gas/fluid and mobilize residual stool
- Low-dose technique (low mAs, dose modulation); 120 kV
- Thin collimation, 0.625-1.25 mm recon for 2D/3D fly-through
- Interpret with primary 2D and 3D endoluminal navigation; CAD optional
Series / Sequences
| # | Series / Sequence | Plane | Thickness | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supine axial | axial | 0.625-1.25 mm | Low dose; 2D + 3D fly-through |
| 2 | Prone (or decubitus) axial | axial | 0.625-1.25 mm | Redistribute gas/fluid |
| 3 | 3D endoluminal | 3D | VR | Virtual fly-through |
| 4 | Coronal/Sagittal reformats | coronal/sagittal | thin | Problem solving |
Key points
- Both supine and prone (or decubitus) acquisitions required to distinguish polyps from residual stool and to overcome poor distention
- Stool/fluid tagging is essential to differentiate tagged residue from true polyps
- Adequate distention (CO2 preferred) is the most important quality factor
- Report with C-RADS; polyps >=6 mm clinically relevant; >=10 mm warrant colonoscopy
- Low radiation dose technique; screening is typically non-IV-contrast
References
• ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR Practice Parameter for the Performance of CT Colonography in Adults
• ACR C-RADS reporting
• Radiopaedia: CT colonography ( link
• ACR C-RADS reporting
• Radiopaedia: CT colonography ( link
Source: Researched — verify against your institution
Reference template — verify and adapt to your scanner, vendor and institution before clinical use. Not a substitute for clinical judgment.