RadteraRadtera
‹ All protocols
‹ Back to all protocols

CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)

CT+ ContrastAbdomen & Pelvis
Indications
  • Colorectal cancer screening (average risk)
  • Incomplete optical colonoscopy or patients unable/unwilling to undergo it
  • Evaluation of obstructing colonic lesion (proximal colon mapping)
Patient prep
  • Cathartic bowel prep (PEG or sodium phosphate-based) the day before
  • Fecal/fluid tagging: oral barium and/or iodinated oral contrast (e.g., diatrizoate/Gastrografin) with meals the day before to tag residual stool/fluid
  • Low-residue diet day prior; NPO morning of exam
  • Colonic insufflation with CO2 (preferred, automated) or room air at time of exam via thin rectal catheter
Contrast
AgentOral tagging agent (barium +/- iodinated); IV iodinated optional
Routeoral (tagging), rectal (CO2 insufflation - gas not iodine), IV optional
DoseTagging per regimen; IV contrast (100-125 mL) only if combined diagnostic/staging indication
TimingScreening CTC is typically non-IV-contrast; IV contrast added for symptomatic/known cancer staging
Technique
  • Insufflate colon with CO2 to adequate distention; verify on scout
  • Scan supine AND prone (or decubitus) to redistribute gas/fluid and mobilize residual stool
  • Low-dose technique (low mAs, dose modulation); 120 kV
  • Thin collimation, 0.625-1.25 mm recon for 2D/3D fly-through
  • Interpret with primary 2D and 3D endoluminal navigation; CAD optional
Series / Sequences
#Series / SequencePlaneThicknessNotes
1Supine axialaxial0.625-1.25 mmLow dose; 2D + 3D fly-through
2Prone (or decubitus) axialaxial0.625-1.25 mmRedistribute gas/fluid
33D endoluminal3DVRVirtual fly-through
4Coronal/Sagittal reformatscoronal/sagittalthinProblem solving
Key points
  • Both supine and prone (or decubitus) acquisitions required to distinguish polyps from residual stool and to overcome poor distention
  • Stool/fluid tagging is essential to differentiate tagged residue from true polyps
  • Adequate distention (CO2 preferred) is the most important quality factor
  • Report with C-RADS; polyps >=6 mm clinically relevant; >=10 mm warrant colonoscopy
  • Low radiation dose technique; screening is typically non-IV-contrast
References
• ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR Practice Parameter for the Performance of CT Colonography in Adults
• ACR C-RADS reporting
• Radiopaedia: CT colonography ( link
Source: Researched — verify against your institution
Reference template — verify and adapt to your scanner, vendor and institution before clinical use. Not a substitute for clinical judgment.