CT Scanogram (Leg Length)
CTNo contrastMSK
Indications
- Limb-length discrepancy quantification (congenital, post-traumatic, post-arthroplasty)
- Pre-operative planning for lengthening/epiphysiodesis or revision arthroplasty
- Suitable for children (~age 2+) and adults
Patient prep
- Supine, legs fully extended, patellae pointing up, feet secured neutral (footboard/tape) — no rotation
- Both legs in the field, positioned symmetrically
- No contrast; no breath-hold needs
Contrast
None / non-contrast
Technique
- TOPOGRAM/SCOUT-ONLY technique — an AP (± lateral) CT localizer from above the iliac crests through the bottoms of the feet; no helical acquisition at all
- Very tall patients: split into two overlapping localizers (crests → knees, knees → feet) and measure per segment
- Electronic cursor measurements: femoral head → medial malleolus (total), femoral head → medial femoral condyle (femur), tibial plateau → tibial plafond (tibia)
- Dose is comparable to a radiograph — a fraction of any helical CT
Series / Sequences
| # | Series / Sequence | Plane | Thickness | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AP topogram | frontal localizer | n/a | Crests through feet; measurement image |
| 2 | Lateral topogram (optional) | lateral localizer | n/a | Flexion contracture assessment |
Key points
- No cross-sectional images are acquired — the entire exam is localizer radiographs with cursor measurements, which eliminates the magnification error of conventional radiographic scanograms
- Rotation is the enemy of accuracy: symmetric, secured, extended legs matter more than anything else
- Report per-segment (femur, tibia) and total discrepancies
- Flexion contracture shortens the apparent limb on an AP — add the lateral localizer when extension is limited
Source: Researched — verify against your institution
Reference template — verify and adapt to your scanner, vendor and institution before clinical use. Not a substitute for clinical judgment.