CT for Orthopedic Surgical Planning (Robotic / Custom Arthroplasty)
CTNo contrastMSK
Indications
- Robotic-assisted arthroplasty planning (hip, knee, shoulder, ankle)
- Patient-specific implants and custom cutting guides
- Mechanical axis / version analysis for revision or deformity surgery
Patient prep
- Obtain the specific vendor's protocol sheet BEFORE scanning — coverage, slice thickness, series naming and upload requirements are exam-specific and studies that deviate get rejected
- Strict immobilization: legs fully extended, feet secured perpendicular with footboard/straps; NO pillows or sponges under knees or ankles
- Move contralateral hardware out of the scan volume when possible (flex/pad the other leg)
- No IV or intra-articular contrast unless the vendor explicitly requires it (most reject arthrographic contrast)
Contrast
None / non-contrast
Technique
- The generic pattern behind all vendors: acquire the required joint 'blocks' (e.g. hip + knee + ankle for a mechanical-axis knee plan; pelvis + proximal femur ± knee for hip) with the patient NOT moving between blocks, keeping table position, centering and DFOV coordinates identical — every block must live in one coordinate system
- Thin contiguous slices (0.6-1 mm) with a bone algorithm; no gantry tilt; no motion — repeat any block with motion
- Include the vendor-specified landmarks in full (entire femoral head/pelvis, femoral condyles, ankle mortise; whole scapula including inferior angle for shoulder)
- Use MAR or ~15% higher kVp if hardware must remain in the field
- Export the complete thin-slice DICOM dataset per the vendor's naming/upload instructions
Series / Sequences
| # | Series / Sequence | Plane | Thickness | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proximal joint block (e.g. hip/pelvis) | axial | 0.6-1 mm | Full landmark coverage per vendor spec |
| 2 | Index joint block (e.g. knee/shoulder/ankle) | axial | 0.6-1 mm | Highest-resolution block; entire implant zone |
| 3 | Distal reference block (e.g. ankle condyles) | axial | 1-3 mm | Axis/version reference; same coordinate system |
Key points
- One coordinate system is the whole exam: patient movement or a table/FOV change between blocks invalidates the mechanical-axis calculation and the study will be rejected
- Motion, missing landmarks and intra-articular contrast are the three most common rejection reasons
- This page is the generic pattern — the individual vendor spec sheet (MAKO, ConforMIS, Materialise, Blueprint, etc.) always wins on specifics
- Dose stays modest: bone-only question, no repeats if positioning is done right the first time
References
• Vendor planning-protocol spec sheets (MAKO, ConforMIS, Zimmer-Biomet, Materialise, Blueprint, Exactech and similar) — always follow the current vendor document
• Skeletal Radiology: Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty — what radiologists need to know (Huppertz et al., 2014) link
• Bone Joint J: CT planning studies for robotic total knee arthroplasty (Abdelfadeel et al., 2020) link
• Skeletal Radiology: Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty — what radiologists need to know (Huppertz et al., 2014) link
• Bone Joint J: CT planning studies for robotic total knee arthroplasty (Abdelfadeel et al., 2020) link
Source: Researched — verify against your institution
Reference template — verify and adapt to your scanner, vendor and institution before clinical use. Not a substitute for clinical judgment.